Benjamin Mitchell vs Issei Okamura Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mitchell vs Okamura analysis and find out who is favored!
Benjamin Mitchell vs Issei Okamura Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mitchell 1 - 0 Okamura
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mitchell has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Okamura has won 47.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mitchell, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Okamura has won 51.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.68% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mitchell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Okamura has saved 60% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mitchell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Okamura winning 40% (W/L 16/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mitchell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 216/ 124), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Okamura has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mitchell winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mitchell winning 2 and Okamura winning 1. The last match between Mitchell and Okamura was at the Australia F7 (Brisbane), 04-10-2018, Second, Hard with Benjamin Mitchell getting the victory 6-4 1-6 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mitchell and Okamura have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mitchell winning 1 times and Okamura 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mitchell winning 0, and Okamura 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mitchell has played against opponents with an average rank of while Okamura has played against players with an average rank of 27.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mitchell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Okamura has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mitchell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Okamura has converted 36.92% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mitchell 1 - 0 Okamura
10
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Ret.
Rank
204
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
870
Rank
574
High
31
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
61% (263-171)
Career Total W/L
48% (211-233)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$34,430
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Benjamin Mitchell | Issei Okamura |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 13 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 4 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:54:0 | 1:54:0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (50/82) | 63% (43/68) |
1st Serve Win% | 64% (32/50) | 65% (28/43) |
2nd Serve Win% | 47% (15/32) | 40% (10/25) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 36% (4/11) |
Return Points W% | 44% (30/68) | 43% (35/82) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 1-6 6-1 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Issei Okamura
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Benjamin Mitchell | Issei Okamura |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (8/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (17/21) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (175/176) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.08 |
Aces Total | 0 | 14 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.13 |
DFs Total | 0 | 22 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 42.72 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (401/594) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (259/401) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (92/193) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 37% (24/65) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (254/628) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (8/10) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (8/18) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 89% (9/8) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 11% (9/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (9/0) |
Benjamin Mitchell Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Vincent Stouff
Player
Benjamin Mitchell
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
53%
(
17 of
32)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
32
Total Points Won
22
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Aaron Addison
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Issei Okamura
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
0
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Edward Bourchier
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Nicholas S. Hu
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Nathan Eshmade
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Luke Saville
Player
Benjamin Mitchell
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Benjamin Mitchell
Player
Dayne Kelly
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Issei Okamura Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 |
Dharmil Shah
Player
Issei Okamura
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Jesse Delaney
Player
Issei Okamura
52%
(
36 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Matthew Hulme
Player
Issei Okamura
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
80%
(
75 of
94)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more